Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BookRelay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect to BookCrossing. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] BookRelay
The site itself no longer exists. When removing no longer useful information, such as the FAQ, it's reduced down to a small blurb which was easily added to BookCrossing, where it naturally fit. I was the one who'd tagged it for merger but then realised it was just simpler to add a few lines. Travellingcari (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: and when it did exist there was relatively little coverage that wasn't about particular site offerings. Travellingcari (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Merge into BookCrossing. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- :: Comment disagree on the grounds that the essential information is already covered in BookCrossing and this would be redundant. The vast majority of the content of this article is moot i.e. FAQ for a non-existent site Travellingcari (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- We aren't disagreeing. If it's already merged then all that's left is to Redirect. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Gotcha. In previous merges I'd seen the content of Article A go to a new section in Article B and thought that was always the case, causing redundancy in this case. Travellingcari (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- We aren't disagreeing. If it's already merged then all that's left is to Redirect. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
