Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BookIt.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, G11. The article was substantively similar to the version that was speedied as a G11 by CobaltBlueTony. Author blocked as a spam/advertising only account. Blueboy96 01:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] BookIt.com
notability vague or missing, low Alexa info - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Sounds promotional.Renee (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete A7, non-notable.--Rtphokie (talk) 22:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Speedy A7 would be declined because the article makes assertion of notability. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: The only stab at notability I see there is the award. Awards are generally considered evidence of notability bu the editor of this article will have to forgive me if I don't consider Outstanding deals by an online travel agency in the same light as a Nobel Prize.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Speedy A7 would be declined because the article makes assertion of notability. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete it, Danno. There are a couple of announcements on Google News, and a deal of some kind with Atlantis Paradise Island, a plum for any company, but nothing in the way of independent, in depth coverage. --Dhartung | Talk 22:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete — per nom. —paranomia (formerly tim.bounceback)a door? 23:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Give the author (who likely has a moderate-to-severe COI) a bit of credit for making the article less spammy the second time around, but it still doesn't meet that darn notability standard. --Finngall talk 23:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Blatant conflict of interest, username reported. Non-notable subject, I'd almost say this is G11 material, but its not quite spam. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
