Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booger murphy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Booger murphy

I really don't think he's notable. -Doc ^ask? 22:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The article author implies they'll come up with references on the talk page, but until then, delete. --W(t) 22:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I only see one match [1] in the first couple of pages. Doesn't seem notable to me. PJM 22:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverifiable. Pavel Vozenilek 22:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, only 8 Google hits and only this which states anything about this person. -- Mithent 23:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• I originally marked this for speedy deletion per CSD:A7, which is admittedly tenuous. I'll settle for a slow, regular delete. Stifle 00:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; hoax. - Liberatore(T) 15:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - nn (if even real). dbtfz^talk 06:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.