Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boodu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Sceptre ^(Talk) 09:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boodu

This article contains original research, is written as a definition, instead of a encyclopedia article,and the author doesn't seem to know how to spell the word (s)he is defining. Dp462090 | Talk | Contrib | 10:26, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete Hardly OR, seems more like a neologism. I can't find relevant Google results for it. --^demon 10:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

"Original research is a term used on Wikipedia to refer to material added to articles by Wikipedia editors that has not been published already by a reputable source.", sounds like OR to me.--Dp462090 | Talk | Contrib | 13:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment - I suppose neologisms fall under OR then. My mistake --^demon 14:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.