Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. I invite someone to write a new article with the same name - Richardcavell 04:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bonus

The article is much too narrow (not only investment bankers get bonuses, almost everone might) and contains stuff that is more POV than information. I first thought of dropping the incorrect parts, but would then be left with "A bonus is something people get paid. It is performance related," whih I find below par. Feel free to remove this nomination if someone has replaced the article with something better. Andre Engels 07:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete If properly cleaned up, we'd be left with a dictionary definition. I can see something useful about the history of bonuses, but nothing worth salvaging in the current article. Ace of Sevens 07:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Contains this statement: It is performance related, and in the months coming up to deciding bonus it is particularly important to be nice to your boss. Unsalvageable. A cleanup, as said above, would leave only a dicdef, so delete. --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 08:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone above. -- Kicking222 11:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above —Mets501^talk 15:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Trebor 17:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. £40-60k "relatively low"? Relative to what? Certainly not to the national average, which is £16k. — Haeleth Talk 18:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.