Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie O'Neil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bonnie O'Neil

Bonnie O'Neil (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I've been meaning to AfD this for a while. Article is a case of WP:AUTOBIO/WP:OR/WP:COI as it was created by User:Perryo, who claims to be husband of the subject. She seems to have written or edited a few technical reports, mostly NN as far as I can tell, and edited a textbook or two (not authored, as the article says). Still, no independent sources, so doesn't meet WP:BIO. Danski14(talk) 00:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, per nominator. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!, ???) 01:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom, Do I understand correctly that the second "source" is the personal experience of the article creator, the subject's spouse? Pete.Hurd 02:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, also the father of Chris O'Neil, who apparently is notable. Danski14(talk) 04:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 07:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep, because perhaps others with less of a personal connection can add and improve it? --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
    Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? (talk · contribs) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Rgds, - Trident13
  • Delete per nom. --ElKevbo 21:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete All of the "articles" she has listed seem to be semi-technical write-ups in http://www.b-eye-network.com , and I do not know the reliability or the standards of that website. Some of their material is clearly edited--some of it is probably not. Items from there have been used to support several WP articles, but never as the sole publication medium listed. (It's new to me--does anyone have more knowledge about it?)
She is the principle of Westridge Consulting, and it's odd that this is not even mentioned in the article.Her work is hard to search as there is an apparently more-widely known economic development consultant with the same name. None of her work is in the least academic--not even listed in CiteSeer. It is possible that an article could be written, but not based on this one. DGG 23:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.