Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonclarken
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 18:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bonclarken
Church campground; no notability asserted and inherently nonnotable —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NawlinWiki (talk • contribs) 19:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also as an advertisement. Melchoir 19:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It offers an interesting variety of programs and activities, and it is one of the most notable things about Flat Rock, N.C. (and is a significant employer there). There is ample precedent for listng campground and conference facilities. TruthbringerToronto 22:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to assert notability. While there are other camp articles, when they get found and brought here they regularly get deleted. No independent reliable sources cited. If it is verifiably that important to Flat Rock , it should be in the article for it. And which Flat Rock, N.C. anyway? The link is to a disambiguation page because there are three of them. GRBerry 02:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, perhaps Merge. See also The Columbia Gazetteer of North America — Bonclarken ("Bonclarken, N.C.: see Flat Rock.") and The Columbia Gazetteer of North America — Flat Rock ("... Nearby is Bonclarken, with church assembly grounds. ..."), which both indicate Bonclarken, N.C. as a locality of some sort that may be of equal notability as any of the other thousands of towns and places on Wikipedia. However, this locality may be larger than the campground and ministry—in which case the article would need to become more general and have the campground as one, major, part—or the locality may be totally subordinate to Flat Rock, Henderson County, North Carolina—though the Gazetteer would tend to discount that—and would therefore would warrant merger. In either case, it needs to be fixed up. —Centrx→talk 06:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I do not think that there is actually much precedent, as TruthbringerToronto suggests above, that articles about campgrounds or conference facilities are to be kept. If it is the only notable thing about Flat Rock, then great, we'll have something to add to the Flat Rock article. Pascal.Tesson 22:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Bwithh 02:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I can't see anything notable about this. Just because some people work there there is no need to list is specifically. It could be mentioned in the Flat Rock, Henderson County, North Carolina article however. Inner Earth 18:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.