Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombilla & Gourd Mate Tea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 02:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bombilla & Gourd Mate Tea

Bombilla & Gourd Mate Tea (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete Non-notable company. The sign to prove notability is given is a award - "Best Non-Carbonated Beverage of 2007" by bevnet.com. The award itself is not justified to prove notability. And the article is filled with the products by the company in a form of advertisement. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 06:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 15:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; not only non-notable, but verges on if not meets the standards for "blatant advertising" as well. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete this tea article tastes like spam. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of notability and sources. The sources provided are either primary (from the company itself), non-reliable (a sponsored award), or cannot be evaluated, as no links are provided. This might be a notable brand, but I need more data to judge that. The tone of the article is highly spammy, but that's a cleanup issue. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I would also not object to a speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G11. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom - advert, not notable etc... Bluegoblin7 15:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - it's not too smammy, but the sources are very weak. It tastes like a local beverage company to me. Bearian (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.