Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bomberman '94
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete. The article's context is already summed up in Bomberman, so there is nothing to merge. Hedley 3 July 2005 12:37 (UTC)
[edit] Bomberman '94
Marked as speedy...does not seem to fit. Bringing here. No vote at present. Wikibofh 16:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Google count Results 1 - 10 of about 88,900 for Bomberman 94 Wikibofh 16:28, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Although this is an actual game (see Bomberman), I'm voting delete for the lack of notability. Nestea 18:36, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I put the speedy tag on it as "incomprehensible" I think . . . this article contains no useful information, and, in fact, once scrubbed for POV, no content. And that's not even getting started on notability. Delete--Scimitar 19:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, notable, comprehensible, and reasonably NPOV. A candidate for cleanup, not deletion, especially when only 3 minutes old. Kappa 20:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Or merge/redir all variants to Bomberman, which seems to have plenty of room for expansion, but probably can't be expanded without covering the variants (and any time you have a bunch of short articles with sentences like "In many aspects, the game plays identical to Bomberman 64.", merging seems to provide better context). Niteowlneils 01:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Merge. -Sean Curtin 06:28, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non notable game. JamesBurns 06:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Merge as above. Radiant_>|< 08:58, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
- I see nothing to merge. Nestea 00:38, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Almafeta 23:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.