Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombegalu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 09:09, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bombegalu

Bombegalu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable and non important. Delete. Metal Head (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Non notable, non important, incomprehensible. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - if anything's useful here, it belongs in the Navaratri or Dasara articles. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dasara or Navaratri. Otherwise, definition appears to be verifiable.[1] • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - What's the purpose of this? Doesn't make sense. Turgidson (talk) 01:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#DICT unless anyone can explain the significance of this. I find that India-related articles are quite common at newpages, many of which are dicdef-ish stubs that give little context - probably due to India's huge population and the fact that a significant number there can speak English, especially those in that country with Internet access.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 04:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.