Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolivian Space Program

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. --Rhobite 21:45, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bolivian Space Program

Does any of this make any sense? The author talks about a satelite instead of a program. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:55, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• I would like to vote keep, presuming this is accurate and verifiable. Perhaps it should be moved. Everyking 06:03, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep it: "OF COURSE" I'd want to keep it, I wrote it. Anyway the answer to your question Riff...is that this satellite is the Bolivian Space Program.
  • How can one satelite be the program? -- Riffsyphon1024 06:09, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Its a hoax, delete it. The phrase "Bolivian Space Program" gets no real hits on google, and the external link, that claims to be for a satellite manufacturer that will sell you a satellite for ~$27000 has this tid-bit in the fine print Seeking interracial movies? Click for interracial movies. Considering transsexual dating? Click for transsexual dating info. Click for Los Angeles hair replacement, & hair loss treatment; a real satellite manufacturer, I seriously doubt it --nixie 06:24, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Nice Web site. In Soviet Russia, Sputnik launches you. Anyway, Bolivia is involved in some cooperative commercial space stuff, but Brazil is doing the coordination. --iMeowbot~Mw 12:52, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. From comments above, the current article appears to be a hoax and should be deleted (I'm at work, so there's no way I'm clicking on that link). An article on Bolivian involvement in satellite technology may be a useful article, but not from this. Average Earthman 13:02, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Hoax, spam for a personal page, or something. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:22, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unless much better evidence provided prior to expiration of VfD. anywho.com knows of no businesses in Roswell named "CCA" or "C. L. Haan." Neither does switchboard.com. Website looks like a joke. Very odd that a business would describe itself as "Located just outside Roswell, N.M. on Highway 285" but not provide any street address. All Google hits on "C. L. Haan" are to a druggist in the Netherlands. clhaanind gets an odd variety of hits. Not indexed in archive.org, I wonder why not. whois registration of clhaanind.com is: "Ixat Corp, PMB 285, 4933 W. Craig Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89130, US 818-487-7269." Weird enough to delete unless some very good, consistent, verifiable, well-sourced explanation is provided. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:51, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.