Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojan Pavlovic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, I guess. Not an easy one, and the problem that other users haved edited the article (which excludes it from CSD G7) made this a tricky close. However, per Moreschi conservatism is best, and the consensus from this debate is that this person isn't notable enough. However, please also remember that a subject's wishes aren't always the wishes of the community; however, in this case, they were. Daniel Bryant 04:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bojan Pavlovic
Procedural nomination. Editor claiming to be the article's subject blanked the page, requesting deletion. I'm neutral myself. TexasAndroid 14:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- In the absence of any indication that this person passes either WP:N or WP:BIO, delete in the spirit of WP:BLP - "do no harm". Only circa 600 ghits anyway, and being shortlisted for an award that seems designed to reward those of little encyclopedic notability hardly confers encyclopedic notability. Moreschi Request a recording? 15:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I am the author in question and absolutely agree. This entry was posted after my first novel was published last year to probably increase awareness by agency and to make my profile "googleable." I think having one novel out is far from qualifiying me as ecyclopaedia worthy... Maybe in 20-30 years, however, the that will change ;-) Thanks. BPavlovic 16 March 2007
The verdict is delete. BPavlovic Can someone do it?You don't decide what the verdict is; administrators do. Daniel Bryant 04:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am the author in question and absolutely agree. This entry was posted after my first novel was published last year to probably increase awareness by agency and to make my profile "googleable." I think having one novel out is far from qualifiying me as ecyclopaedia worthy... Maybe in 20-30 years, however, the that will change ;-) Thanks. BPavlovic 16 March 2007
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
