Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing 737-233

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was MERGE AND REDIRECT -- Francs2000 | Talk 23:37, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Boeing 737-233

Hoax, Air Canada inherited their 737-200s from Canadian Airlines and Boeing customer numbers don't change upon sale or new ownership of aircraft FunkyChicken! July 5, 2005 05:56 (UTC)

• Delete this, the one below, and the other unremarkable subvariants contributed by the same user:
  • Boeing 727-214
  • Boeing 737-214
  • Boeing 737-217
  • Boeing 737-219
  • Boeing 737-221
  • Boeing 737-222
  • Boeing 737-223
  • Boeing 737-225
  • Boeing 737-230
  • Boeing 737-233
  • Boeing 737-2B7
  • Boeing 737-2H4

(or at the very least redirect them to Boeing 727 and Boeing 737 respectively. None of them contain any information other than noting which airline this model number was built for. If any when anyone can add anything substantial to what differentiates them, some may eventually warrant separate articles. Others may be hoaxes/mistakes also. --Rlandmann 5 July 2005 07:09 (UTC)

• Delete and if possible (ie somebody is willing to take the time) merge verifiable claims with 737 article. As per Rlandmann. --Moritz 5 July 2005 09:54 (UTC)
• Delete/Merge. It might be polite to ask the contributor to gently merge the information with the 737 article himself? --Excession 5 July 2005 10:29 (UTC)
  • Good idea. Rlandmann has already been in dialogue with him about these pages, see the guys talk page... I'll add something. --Moritz 5 July 2005 10:36 (UTC)
  • I believe the "contributor" is a blocked sockpuppet. --Mothperson 5 July 2005 13:16 (UTC)
• Merge — at least some of these variants do show up in other sources.[1], [2] and particularly [3]. But I think they can be readily merged into a table on the appropriate Boeing aircraft pages. — RJH 5 July 2005 16:03 (UTC)
• Merge all - definitely don't obliterate from the encyclopedia altogether. -- BD2412 ^talk July 5, 2005 22:18 (UTC)
• Merge all, as per BDA. JamesBurns 6 July 2005 06:58 (UTC)
• Merge the lot of them. Radiant_>|< July 6, 2005 13:30 (UTC)
• Merge per RJH RoySmith 6 July 2005 18:02 (UTC)
• Comment The 737-225 and 737-233 are not actual aircraft, so they should not be merged. The others should be merged or place on a Boeing 737-200 first tier customer list. If anything the history of Air Canada's 737-200s which were inherited from Canadian Airlines which in turn inherited them from CP Air, Eastern Provincial Airlines, and Pacific Western Airlines after they were all merged into Canadian. Just because Air Canada owned them doesn't mean that they get renumbered Boeing customer numbers (see the book Boeing Aircfaft from 1916 by Peter Bowers for a complete explination). I have spent about 10 minutes going over the 737-200 production list and there are not any 737-233s or 737-225s, for that matter. You can find one such list here [4]. FunkyChicken! July 9, 2005 00:47 (UTC)
• Delete I have made an error in my research. Also thanks to Radiant for changing my original user Toasthaven's password. I am reporting you! -- Toasthaven2 16:06, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.