Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodekbeska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bodekbeska

Bodekbeska (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It's a "word created by a group of students". Enough said. MER-C 06:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as unsourced article about a neologism which doesn't even clearly define the word in question. --Metropolitan90 06:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, wikipedia is WP:NOT for something you make up one day. Davewild 18:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. per... per... Well, per all of it. Pigman^what?/trail 02:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Clear failure of WP:NEO. Doctorfluffy 02:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.