Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobcat Bite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bobcat Bite

Bobcat Bite (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Sounds like a nice place, don't get me wrong, but...article claims it has been mentioned in US papers, even in the New York Times - I say delete unless these "mentions" are sourced, and if the mentions are just brief mentions, it's not gonna be worth the while keepin it Moglex 21:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep I added a reference to an award won (well, really an appearance on a top 20 list from GQ) and a reference to an appearance in a documentary. Checking the restaurant's website, you can find mentions of other awards/appearances in papers/magazines tha could likely be added (not now for me though, off to work). Seems notable enough, however. Craw-daddy 08:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ELIMINATORJR 00:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - although I must admit I am biased considering this was the first article & edits I made on Wikipedia ;). I added references from the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Santa Fe Reporter, and ABQ Journal. These inclusions should satisfy WP:NOTE. Chupper 14:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - With the new references, it is definitely a worthwhile article.Silver seren 19:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - the references look solid enough to indicate some notability. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Seems notable enough. Bart133 (t) (c) 23:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.