The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. r3m0ttalk 18:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
This is absolutely hilarious, possible for BJAON but non encyclopedic nontheless. Batman2005 21:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
delete article is a pet parody of a non notable bio, with hoax info, and claims. DVD+ R/W 23:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete but add to BJAODN. Capitalistroadster 00:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
This is great and absolutely hilarious. I would not eliminate this article as just to read the article makes one smile and parhaps recall a like animal in one's life similar to Bobby Martin
BJAODN, obviously. Stifle 23:43, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
While I agree that the article is different, I found it very informative and well written. My vote is to keep it in the encyclopedia for informational purposes.
BJAODN not exactly hilarious, but it is a tale with legs... Pete.Hurd 05:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Very well written article with some informative content.