Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Slayer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bob Slayer

Bob Slayer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable bio. Jmlk17 04:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy G4 - the previous AFD closed as "delete". So tagged. Zetawoof_(ζ) 05:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I don't think the current version is substantially identical to the deleted one, so I'm declining the G4 speedy. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Fair enough. I don't have access to the deleted version, so I was just going off the previous discussion. Zetawoof_(ζ) 08:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. I found this which demonstrates some coverage. I'm not sure that it's enough, though. I couldn't verify many of the claims in the article.--Michig (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable - possible vanity article. Dreamspy (talk) 08:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Surely this can be speedily deleted, since this has been hashed out once before and is very likely going to reach the same conclusion. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Round two. (jarbarf) (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Maybe it's time for a good culling of all the bands/managers/albums that have made no impact on anyone's cultural landscape. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 23:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.