Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Reed JP, naturist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bob Reed JP, naturist

Bob Reed JP, naturist (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

""Robert Reed" naturist" gets 284 ghits, generally unencyclopedic.

2 prev csd (A7) attempts.

Only assertion of n is running a nude bathing organization that dissolved after he left. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 16:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletions. -- OSbornarfcontributionatoration 16:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No valid assertion of notability. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 17:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or Merge into Australian Nudist Federation. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I gotta admin, the quote about very little money for required clothing was almost humorous, but I don't see the notability. Pharmboy (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep article suffers from a serious case of m:sofixit, but subject was non-trivially mentioned in New South Wales Parliament, and has been interviewed on the Jenny Brockie show on radio 2BL (NSW). JERRY talk contribs 19:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. No evidence of notability as WP understands the term. POV issues as well. andy (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I see no solid evidence for notability beyond what could be covered in other naturist articles. SaveThePoint (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.