Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluepill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete also agree that Redpill though it should be done via an separate afd as there hasnt been any consideration of it within this. Gnangarra 14:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bluepill

Bluepill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is just an in-universe repetition of plot points from the Matrix movies, and has no notability or referencing of its own. As this is all covered by the Matrix film article, this is duplicative and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. No sources given. No assertion that this is notable outside the context of the movies, and therefore it should not be separated from the articles about the movies. Worse yet, the concept of "the blue pill" - the actual pill offered to people - may actually be a notable concept, while this isn't. Argyriou (talk) 06:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Expand or Merge 'red pill' and 'blue pill' are used to describe people who seek out and believe the truth rather than just accepting what is told to them by the mainstream or those in power. I assume the term came from the movie. I looked up these articles to see if it existed before the movie. I have definitely seen and heard the terms used without mentioning the movie, such as referring to "people who take the blue pill". --Kalmia (talk) 04:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete this is ridiculous. All this film-cruft just makes WikiPedia look silly NBeale (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Does not meet WP:FICT covered with WP:PLOT. Seems like an attempt to start a WP:NEO. -Verdatum (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Redpill should probably also be AFD'd. It's slightly better formatted, but doesn't due much better to establish notability. -Verdatum (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.