Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue pro studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 02:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blue pro studios

A recording studio that is a subsidary of a company not that doesn't even have its own wikipedia article, and set up by a person who doesn't have on either. Google hits for the company are slim. Delete -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 21:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as obviously non-notable, seeing as their parent company is a redlink and few GHits exist. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 22:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Strikes me as odd that the article's author would make wikireferences to other nonexistent articles, without creating said pages to lend some semblence of credibility to the article. --Nonstopdrivel 00:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

• Just a clarification, I created the inter-wiki links (all the links were just bold text before) so I could click on a link to the page about the company, and that's when I saw it didn't exist. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 00:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Ah, I understand. There have been many times when I was wikilinking an article and noticed how little corroborative information there was. Good eye. --Nonstopdrivel 02:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, CSD A7. Article about a company which doesn't assert notability. - Zeibura ^Talk 00:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Rob C (Alarob) 01:40, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.