Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomhead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bloomhead

Bloomhead (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Previously speeded under A7 and has now been created, so off to AfD this article with no claims of notability, covering an organization with no significant secondary-source coverage, goes. Badger Drink (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete lovely spam wonderful spam. JuJube (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete it'd be prod except the article was created with a hangon tag! Someone clue them in... Potatoswatter (talk) 08:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Really, shouldn't there be a better process for this? Potatoswatter (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. It's just spam. -- Qaddosh|^talk|contribs 09:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --JulesN Talk 10:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, pretty shameless spam. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC).
• Delete - pure corporate spam. Doc Tropics 19:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.