Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodymania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bloodymania

Bloodymania (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable indy-wrestling event. Davnel03 15:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. Davnel03 15:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails notability, sources. SirFozzie (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable at all. FamicomJL (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Don't Delete Why delete this? No sources? Violent J stated it on radio for two months startight prior to the event, it is seen on the videos of Weekly Freekly Weekly on ICP's website, it was also talked about on ICP's website, it's out on DVD, and hell it was even reviewed by 1wrestling.com as seen on the wiki page. So there isn't a possible reason for deletion. If you delete this, minds well delete Wrestlemania, Bound For Glory, and all wrestling events.Juggalobrink (talk) 21:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Please be civil. There was no need for the last part of that comment. Davnel03 21:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I removed it. And I just edited the page adding in the link to the DVD and a few other stuff. I still feel there is no reason for it to be closed.Juggalobrink (talk) 21:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Notability still isn't established from multiple reliable sources. The 1wrestling.com reference is a dirtsheet, therefore not reliable, one source is a DVD the other is an advertisement. Infact, the main part of the article is a blatant copy-vio of the 1wrestling source. Therefore, the main body should be removed immediately. Davnel03 22:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
    • No problem. I didn't add the review to the page, so I just removed it from the body. I don't really know what else to add. I don't know the technical stuff here, so what exactly needs to be noted? The fact the event is real and took place, or the fact the matches took place? Because there's not much else I can do notability wise other than add pictures from the wrestlers' myspaces (which I think would be kind of stupid for a wiki-page). How do other events provide notablilty (if it isn't too much trouble)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juggalobrink (talk • contribs) 23:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Events far more notable than this one were deleted basically in a whitewash. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 07:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per precedent. Non-notable and fails WP:V. Nikki311
• Dont Delete, however it should be cleaned up.the juggreserection (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, I have looked over the article, and I agree it is horrible. But, as stated above, it does require clean-up. And we have recently semi-started a Psychopathic Records WikiProject, and we can all work on this. --JpGrB 21:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete pre nom and precedent, we don't have WWE DVDs listed on here so I doubt JCW could meet WP:N. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.