Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogroll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. --Titoxd^(?!?) 02:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blogroll

• Useless neoljizzum, merge into List of Blogging Terms if it's not already there. Skrewler 05:02, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
  • This is already int he List of Blogging Terms. Why do we need a whole article on a term that refers to your list of blog sites
• Keep--valid article on a potentially confusing (and certainly interesting) term. This amount of information wouldn't fit into List of blogging terms. Meelar (talk) 05:04, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary. A definition for a frequent term in the blogosphere that is useful as a dictionary item. Jtmichcock 05:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable term in blogging. Long enough to stand alone. Capitalistroadster 05:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Since List of blogging terms already has enough information on this. After all, this is just a list of blogs on a blog. Heeello. Borderline dicdef here too. --Timecop 05:55, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; being a real word is not sufficient for an encyclopedia entry. —Wahoofive (talk) 05:57, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As is stands the article is more than a dictionary definition. -- Curps 06:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Herostratus 06:39, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Duplicate content and dictdef. Every phenomenon generates epiphenomenal slang. Geogre 13:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: interesting article about a widespread term that has seen more press than most other silly blog-related vocabulary. - squibix 16:02, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki as per Jtmichcock. Qwghlm 16:33, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep word transcends simple blog-culture jargon. Jessamyn 02:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. agrees with Jessamyn. __earth 04:00, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• If this is deleted, please replace with a redirect to the list of blogging terms so the entry there can be found. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:04, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep this word has been everywhere. CNN has used it! Jacqui^★ 15:25, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep this is a term that is widely used enough that it merits a discussion of its origin and history. It exemplifies wikipedia's importance as a flexible encyclopedia that adapts to changing terminology of the internet. mennonot 10:32, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Informative article. Just because you don't agree with the contents doesn't mean its not encyclopaedic. Rhobite 20:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Capitalistroadster and Jessamyn. MCB 22:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Very helpful to someone unfamiliar with a term to be able to Google it and find this page near the top of the list.dawno 23:27, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep As a blogger newbie this article was very helpful. Lawyer2b 03:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.