Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogject
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to Julian Bleecker. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-02 02:35Z
[edit] Blogject
This article is classified as being of unclear importance since last June. It seems to be an internet meme coined by Julian Bleecker. I was going to be bold and merge the article with its creator's article but I am not sure (it would require shortening it a lot) so I prefer asking your opinion first. Merge to Julian Bleecker -- lucasbfr talk 06:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete - seems to be a term that might be gaining in usage, but to qualify as a neologism that's notable enough for Wikipedia, there needs to be some secondary sources that discuss the use of the term (rather than articles that make a passing usage of the term). A couple of newspaper articles (or similar) items that discuss the use of it as a new term would satisfy this, but I couldn't find any. Tarinth 16:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete or merge to Julian Bleecker. Yet another brand-new blog neologism. --- RockMFR 17:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete this neologism Guy (Help!) 11:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
