Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogivism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete--a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blogivism

3 google hits, all from inside wikipedia. nn neologism, or at least that's what someone hopes it is. extreme quick delete. Timecop 00:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. neologism Incognito 00:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, bloggers make up new, meaningless words faster than they can punch them into Wikipedia. silsor 00:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete wikipedia is not for something made up at school one day WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 00:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - made up word, per nom. -- Femmina 00:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Flapdragon 00:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Meaningless, made up word, not notable. Mike _{(T C)} 00:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per above. --Hosterweis 00:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism. I don't know how this qualifies for speedy deletion, though. Sycthos^Talk 01:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. — Moe ε 03:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Blnguyen 04:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. - Dharmabum420 06:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-18 09:11Z
• Comment. I wonder if anyone uses the word Blogivism as they do blog since it does refer to blogging.. -- Eddie 10:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Timecop. Sarah Ewart 11:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and maybe ... just maybe ... in a few years this will turn into a notable neologism. But I don't think so. When I think of "blog" I practically already think of activism or advocacy anyway. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 17:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above Lvialviaquez 17:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pointless blogcruft. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 21:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for fairly obvious reasons. Cptchipjew 22:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What is this trash doing on wikipedia? Aigis 23:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, what an awful excuse for an article. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 01:14, Jan. 19, 2006
• Delete. Ugh. Hideous neologism, so glad it's not notable — T-Boy: (complain bitterly) (laugh contemptuously) 01:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this utter trash. NONCENSORED Popeye 01:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Total failure. Blackyheartiez 22:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Buzzword Mish-Mash Viscid 06:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this trash term. *drew 05:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.