Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogger's contract

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was copyvio. – ABCD 19:34, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blogger's contract

Unencyclopedic. Google search reveals few hits, which for anything related to blogs doesn't bode well; doesn't seem to be widely used. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:56, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Specific to being a student. Might make more sense in context of an article about Internet-based educational practices or something. Sitting out by itself, no. Since it is mostly an example taken from an external website, is it a copyvio? FreplySpang 16:11, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• I tagged it as copyvio from here DaveTheRed 23:36, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.