Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 12:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blog Networks

Delete definition that better belongs in Blog. Mindmatrix 20:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge anything useful into blog. Edgar181 21:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Smerge to Blog#Collaborative. This is a protologism for "collaborative blog". —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 22:41Z
• Delete since relevant content exists at blog (will accept merge as well as accomplishing the same thing. Eusebeus 23:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per User:Quarl. --Wrathchild ^(talk) 13:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. Incognito 03:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or merge. Less blogcruft, kthxbye. 213.106.152.192 03:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for a laundry list of reasons: original research, made-up concept, text is almost redundant to title, dictionary definition, not notable, and blogcruft. silsor 03:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. useless blogcrap. --Timecop 04:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per silsor WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 04:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - same crap we don't need on the wikipedia. --Hosterweis 09:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.