Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleak Hill Rovers JFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Chetblong^{T C} 04:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bleak Hill Rovers JFC

Bleak Hill Rovers JFC (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable junior football club. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 12:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, definitely non-notable. English peasant 14:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete completely non-notable ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete I feel this page gives the reader a good taste of junior sport in the borough of St Helens. Many people in the borough associate with BHR and feel this is a very well run and well practised football club. I do not see how deleting this article can be of benefit to anyone except picky admins who delight in this sort of thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy da gr8 (talk • contribs)
  • Above editor is the article's creator ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
• Perhaps Jimmy's right - perhaps we need an article on a club of this format, though this says it is "one of the biggest". Suggest we delete this and create a similar article for an average-sized and average-performing club in the league, as an example of what the league is like on average. You wouldn't mind the article being on one of Bleak Hill's rivals, if your aim is to just provide a taste of St Helens sport, now, would you Jimmy? Ah... but which club? That could cause a problem. No, the best thing is probably just to delete this and leave it at that. Grutness...wha? 00:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• May i just say: this article is causing no harm whatsoever. It does not contain controversial views, does not slander and is not biased. I do not see why it should be deleted. --Jimmy da gr8 (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• And for the record I would not mind an article on a different club in the town. I produced this Bleak Hill article as I know most about this club. Also producing an article about a "rival" club would mean producing an article on another big club therefore contradicting oneself.--Jimmy da gr8 (talk) 12:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete not notable BanRay 20:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.