Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blazing Violets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 00:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blazing Violets
Wasn't sure if this qualified for A7. Insufficient evidence of notability. One article found here: Vue Weekly. Can't find evidence for, "Blazing Violet Productions is an independent film company which has competed in numerous film festivals since its inception and won several awards." Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 23:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Blazing Violet Productions reference removed. Worldonastring
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 03:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. No references or sources. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 04:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, bandcruft, non-notable, no verification. Realkyhick 06:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - no hits, no CDs on major label, no independent reviews. Fails WP:MUSIC. TerriersFan 16:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Way to kill creativity. If a person wants to check out a band on a major label with top 40 hits, they might as well go to the band's actual homepage to find out about them. How about the thousands of other bands that have articles on here that are just as independent and "unknown"?
Independent review AND a feature article added to increase notability. Worldonastring 19:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
