Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blank page vandalism

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Eugene van der Pijll 18:12, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blank page vandalism

I'd vote delete as this seems to be a neologism. At the very least, there doesn't seem to be articles on different types of vandalism, so it could be a merge candidate. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:57, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

• I agree, it should be merge, but not sure where. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 07:59, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Move to [[Wikipedia:...]] namespace. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 08:58, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to WP:VAND. Radiant_>|< 09:34, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Reduce to a single sentence and merge with the list in WP:VAND, the rest is redundant with other information in the Wikipedia namespace. Funnily enough, the creating user has been blocked for vandalism in the past, so it might have been written by a real expert... --IByte 11:17, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Comment: I thought you weren't to create redirects across namespaces so perhaps merge with vandalism instead of WP:VAND? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 15:12, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

It could be moved to the Wikipedia namespace, merged with WP:VAND, and the article space redirect deleted. That would preserve the article history, get the self-referential stuff out of the article space, and avoid a cross-namespace redirect. Of course, this doesn't actually seem to be worth all the effort—so I'm going to say just DELETE this. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:06, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Not worth the effort of merging. --Carnildo 22:41, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, self-referential. Gazpacho 01:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing to merge. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nothing to merge. JamesBurns 07:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, if the person feels WP:VAND doesn't adequately explain this, he/she can discuss it there. Dcarrano
• Delete (as above) - The Time Killer

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.