Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blair Segal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blair Segal

Blair Segal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 23:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Valrith 01:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep, because being in over 100 movies is quite impressive and notable. Just add more references, but otherwise, seems significant enough and clearly some readers/editors are interested in this lady. --164.107.223.217 03:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid being in over 100 movies doesn't establish notability, per WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 09:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Over 100 films, mentioned in the article. Another time-wasting AfD abusing the term "notability." Dekkappai 17:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid being in over 100 movies doesn't establish notability, per WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 17:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Epbr123 is right, lots of movies does not satisfy the inclusion criteria for actors, pornographic or otherwise. Valrith 17:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - although I disagree with Epbr123's apparent crusade to keep the porn off Wikipedia, in this case she appears to have no awards, independent coverage or notability within a niche genre. All the people !voting keep may want to take another look at WP:PORNBIO as the porn criteria are different than those for mainstream actors - iridescenti (talk to me!) 11:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing in the article right now that argues notability (especially since film count got closed out of the criteria) and the closest I could find to her winning an award is that she appeared in Real Female Masturbation 5, which was nominated AVN Award for Best Specialty Tape, Other Genre in 2001. That, folks, is just too tangential. Tabercil 00:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.