Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blah

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep.  Grue  21:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blah

Already has an entry in Wiktionary. Eddie.willers 04:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep: the wictionary entry is pretty terse, as befits a dictionary. This article has had quite a bit of editing, and seems to me to carry more content than could usefully be on Wiktionary. Naturenet | Talk 07:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 09:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as this isn't a dicdef - and there's definitely more comment that could be added.Vizjim 15:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I'll even expand it a tad... Mindmatrix 14:07, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - not a dictionary definition. Kosebamse 08:36, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: — This article is blah. This is better suited for a dictionary. Should we have a Wikipedia article about every word (or sort of word) in every language? I don't think so.
• Keep - I point non-english speakers here... I guess I could point them somewhere else if it ceased to exist. 20:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.