Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete in this state. Userfied to User:Douglasnicol/Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock to allow further work.  Sandstein  20:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock

Blackwood & Morton Kilmarnock (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Notability tagged since April...appears to try to claim notability from the carpets on the Titanic...however it wasn't this branch of the company that created those as stated in the article. They aren't notable because another division did something notable. Fails WP:N and WP:RS LegoTech·(t)·(c) 15:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. The company that carpeted Titanic might be notable, but not this one. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete This article is doesn't really establish WP:ORG. Worse still, its creator is a banned sockpuppet: [1] Artene50 (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete:' Fails WP:ORG. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:21, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. See the exhibits at Future Museum South West Scotland - Carpet and Linoleum Manufacture at http://www.futuremuseum.co.uk/Default.aspx?Id=217 (museums are usually reliable sources) --Eastmain (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep if we can try and get some better info. Okay, here's the deal, I live in the same area as Kilmarnock and have quite a few books on the subject, I can try and put up some info on BMK if you like, if you like I can put some of the info from here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kilmarnock#BMK into the BMK entry and remove some of the messier formatting. After all, we really don't need to know 3 or 4 times over that the BMK office site was the site of a Safeways. If I do some tidy up and try to work some references in from published materials, actual books I possess would you be okay at least at me trying it? Douglasnicol (talk) 21:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• In addition, I'm removing non-relevant content first. The fact that a Safeways closed has absolutely nothing to do with BMK as at this time Safeways shop closure was to do with the Morrisons buyout, therefore not relevant, the AMH warehouse closure was due to flooding. If you give me time I can try and get a tidier and far more relevant article up. I might need some help in putting in the references, but that's not the material, its the technical side in how to cite them. Douglasnicol (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.