Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Mesa: Source
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 03:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Black Mesa: Source
Yet another non-notable, non-released, Half-Life 2 mod. Could be vaporware. Cyde Weys votetalk 06:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Fanmods for games need to show some pretty fancy evidence of widespread notablilty to survive a deletion discussion. Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 09:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not a fan of posting stats about games that don't have any form of playable game even in beta nor any backing by any major commercial entity. Should definitely be added later if they release even a private beta (which would put it light years ahead of a ton of other Mods) --Nick Catalano (Talk) 17:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 20:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm okay with mods having articles. Unreleased mods, however, are not very article-worthy (but may be footnote-worthy in some other article). Welcome back when there's an actual playable release and people went a-playing screamingly! Too many mods die in an eternal development limbo. (Just noted today that Ultima VIII: Exile has died. I'm cranky. Sorry. Doesn't make my point less valid, just stronger, I hope.) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 21:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete mainly because the link to the site doesn't work correctly. But I should point out that there are other mods (a Apocolypse Mod for BattleField 2 for example) that are on Wiki, but not slated for deletion. If there was evidence that this mod was further along, perhaps in some sort of beta release, I would be against deletion. However, there is really no available evidence that it is anywhere. Headrattle 23:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
the site is currently down but the mod is moving along quite nicly....they wont be releasing a beta because it would be crappy and unfinished so....there you go.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.