Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Horse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE as notability was not asserted.  But|seriously|folks  06:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Black Horse

Black Horse (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete are all beers notable? I think not and this unsourced article is about a nn beer. In another form and under another title it was speedied as nn firm, but keeps coming back so let's figure it out here. Carlossuarez46 04:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. It's just a catalogue/directory page. Non-notable without references Dick G 05:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete (and I think the point of AFD after speedy is to gain consensus so don't rush). It's basically G11 without any other encyclopedic content. --Dhartung | Talk 05:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, agreed 'speedy' was probably excessive in the context of a second nom Dick G 05:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as essentially empty and contextless entry unless someone can actually write an article here. Ford MF 05:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails to assert notability, in fact this article is below a stub. - Caribbean~H.Q. 05:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, does not assert any notability whatsoever to this beer. JIP | Talk 06:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.