Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BjornSocialist Republic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BjornSocialist Republic

BjornSocialist Republic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable micronation located on a rock. Corvus cornix_talk 00:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Kannie | talk 00:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - G3 as a hoax. —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 02:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above and WP:V. BJ^Talk 02:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep the article inlcudes two reliable second party sources. [1] [2] This makes it notable according to WP:NOT. Please read the article, the sources and WP:NOT before commenting on afds. --neonwhite user page talk 03:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment what does this have to do with WP:NOT? BJ^Talk 03:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Make that WP:N. --neonwhite user page talk 03:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect, possibly? I don't think it is notable enough to have it's own article, but I do think it could be mentioned in a Swedish one... Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 05:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps if someone wrote about Lake Immeln in Scania./212.116.91.82 (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Few lines once in a newspaper don't make it notable. Do not merge with articles about serious topics please. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 15:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:NOT#NEWS does not necessarily prevent articles such as this. --neonwhite user page talk 06:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I added some sources./212.116.91.82 (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Regardless, the coverage is clearly trivial.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, some micronations are notable, but this one isn't. A flip article in the "Oddly Enough" column doesn't qualify as non-trivial coverage in my view. Lankiveil (talk) 12:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC).
• Delete utterly non-notable. Making the "odd news item" section of a newspaper does not a subject notable. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 14:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Neither of these articles are trivial, one is the lead item and the other is the times lifestyle column. --neonwhite user page talk 18:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• I guess it's no less notable than many of the other entries at the list of micronations, but that's WP:WAX and doesn't imply that this should be kept.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

If it's not kept, the list ought to be "cleaned up"./212.116.91.82 (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.