Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizzlebox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bizzlebox

Bizzlebox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Dicdef and non-notable neologism. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete for reasons given by nominator - this is little more than a WP:DICDEF. Terraxos 03:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Please Keep!: How does that compare to the entry for just 'izzle' alone? Surely 'Bizzlebox' has more meaning. User:Bizzlebox —Preceding comment was added at 21:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Per above (NEO, DICT, N). - Rjd0060 04:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NEO Balloonman 06:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, once you remove the unconnected triavia you're left with nothing more than a dic def. Nuttah68 09:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Article serves no purpose and adds no value as far as I can tell. Ringbark 17:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I rather like the word, but yes, it's not really notable. mattbuck 20:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable neologism. Snigbrook 01:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.