Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizarre Uprising 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bizarre Uprising

A sister website to the nomination above, this webcomic can be found here. As mentioned in the previous nomination, the Alexa ranking is roughly 550,000. A google search for "bizarre uprising" gives 180 links and none from a respected source. This is also the 2nd nomination for the comic, it's first nomination was identical to that of Entertain-Dome's in terms of the points made and can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizarre Uprising. - Hahnchen 00:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete unless notability via mentions in major media, reputable online sources, etc can be demonstrated. - brenneman{T}{L} 01:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete another one? Whoever it is, please stop posting web comic articles - you surely won't attract more hits. --Jay(Reply) 01:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment This webcomic has been on Wikipedia since last March. The recent spate of webcomic AfDs has nothing to do with a sudden influx of new webcomic articles. They're just being targeted for a clean-up. A misguided one, IMNSHO. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 02:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, no references to reputable sources, I haven't been able to find any, does not appear to meet WP:WEB notability guidelines. -- Dragonfiend 03:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. pschemp | talk 07:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I feel that this is notable enough. --Siva1979Talk to me 09:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm not trying to be argumentative, but based upon what? If you give a clear indication of what your argument in based upon, then someone else who comes along may be swayed by your reasoning. The difference between "D - NN" and "K - N" is subtle, but the former depends upon facts already in evidence while the latter depends upon... well, we don't know what yet. Even if you just say something like "Alexa over 500K is good enough for me." Thanks - brenneman{T}{L} 12:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: I don't see a good reason to delete. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 13:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable and void of any encyclopedic value --Mecanismo | Talk 17:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, doesn't appear to meet WP:WEB.--Isotope23 17:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, no verification. Ziggurat 06:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.