Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitties
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 01:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Bitties
Delete: I don't think this page is anything more than nonsense, despite a fancy diagram. The math formula is definitely nonsense. A recent anonymous IP made several other nonsense edits around the same time as this page. Hu 08:42, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism, duplicate with "love handles" and central obesity. JFW | T@lk 08:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dlyons493 13:50, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep enough in 55,900 google hits for "bitties" and "fat" to suggest that its worthwhile in its own right. At min merge with love handles. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 16:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - a search on google for coincidences of Bitties and the related "Love Handles" gives very little, and all or most of the references there don't refer to fat on the back. The entire article after the first paragraph is at best original research, and the statistics and formulae are pretty clearly jokes. Also, the image, that the author claims is his own work, likely isn't. -Meegs 19:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense. Moriori 22:40, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete This article is just. plain. stupid. Reyk 23:44, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete It has to be a joke. -- Dalbury(Talk) 01:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
