Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitterwood (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Consensus is that the topic does not meet the general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 20:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bitterwood (novel)

Bitterwood (novel) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An unsourced article about a non-notable novel Rackabello 16:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• I'm trying to get a source for the article. Feel that the novel will be much more notable in a short time timbo_29544 19:35, 7 October 2007
• Delete No sources, no assertion, no notability. Please note that the addition of a source may not automatically make the book notable. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 17:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep This is being mentioned all over blogspace. Of course I haven't used that as referencing. However the reaction to the work seem fairly widespread. I have added reference to a notable review from the UKs Guardian. Notability as not high but it is not nonexistent either. Check article for latest state of editing some aspect of the comments above are historical. Thanks. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 09:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - one third-party source isn't enough to confer notability.--Voxpuppet (talk • contribs) 09:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep There's also a starred review at publisher's weekly, for what that is worth. [1]. Sheffield Steel^talk_stalk 18:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.