Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitter dino

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bitter dino

Bitter dino (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

...a slang term for people who aren't in a fan scene anymore. Enough said. UsaSatsui (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete - ...for a game which was practically still borne when released. So many reasons to delete to choose from. This one is broadest. BusterD (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete it's documented in some written material, but I do not thing this phrase is notable outside the context of this particular fan group. --NickPenguin(contribs) 03:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree 100% with BusterD. There are a lot of reasons! Canyouhearmenow 04:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per above reasoning. It did make me smile. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable neologism that has yet to migrate beyond the swamps in which it evolved. --Ig8887 (talk) 08:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NEO. Percy Snoodle (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Verifiability and notability issues were tagged months ago, but never resolved. Dl2000 (talk) 23:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - I have been around fandom a long time and I have never heard of this term before. Not that I need to be the litmus test here, but if it had notabilty I figure someone should have heard of it at least. Web Warlock (talk) 20:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.