Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bit Whore

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 23:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bit Whore

Appears to be a dictionary/neologism page; poor attempt at being funny. MardukZero 03:13, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to geek. --Sn0wflake 05:08, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete However.. it made me laugh. <> Who 04:36, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Being an IT tech it didnt offend me, but I'm open minded, so change vote; agree with Phil.

What do you call 2 IT techs?

One too many.

• Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 04:57, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect, BJAODN, oh yes, and demean the professions of those responsible. — Phil Welch 05:02, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Xcali 05:26, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per MarukZero and Megan1967, also no references. Quale 11:13, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Affrodyetee 05:43, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN Mozzerati

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.