The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. SlimVirgin(talk) 14:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
While there is a source listed, it does not work. The one sentence that is this article is pure speculation and not-notable. Páll(Die pienk olifant) 07:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete dictdef; the single sentence doesn't really seem to be worth sourcing. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 08:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete 367 Ghits only--Jusjih 14:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.