Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioresonance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bioresonance

Advert, quack, nn, unverified and specious. Midgley 20:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless verified and referenced. Stifle 22:33, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete barring references ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 23:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but rename as Bioresonance therapy. Doesn't appear to be an advertisement, but any commerical links should be removed. It is definitely quackery, but quackery isn't necessarily a reason to delete. It does appear to be verifiable subject in that "bioresonance" gets 103,000 Google hits amd "bioresonance therapy" gets 29,900. Claims of success and other whatnot should be attributed to sources. -AED 21:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.