Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioplintcarnorythmics

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:13, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bioplintcarnorythmics

I'm no scientist - so apologies if in ignorance I'm wrong. But no googles for this - nor the scientists cited leaves me suspicious --Doc (?) 15:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete - a "non-existent field of science". Hmm... Anilocra 15:48, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --RobertG ♬ talk 15:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Transforming a graviton into a protein? Give me a break. Delete. -- BD2412 ^talk 21:31, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
• Delete total b.s. --Etacar11 23:46, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete utter nonsense. Plus, refers to 'secret' writings - so surely uncitable and unpublished. -Splash 00:45, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--pure gibberish. StuTheSheep 05:11, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. JamesBurns 06:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - rapidly. Complete nonsense.--Ian Pitchford 10:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense. --Kimchi.sg | Talk 15:35, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Please. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Orbitally rearranged monoatomic element and send to FAC. Sorry, it's getting late in France. Delete and let me go to bed. Physchim62 21:31, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.