This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle(Check!) 10:03, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
No original research. Google turns up 5 results for the phrase, including the wikipedia article. None are reliable sources or peer-reviewed journals. GeeJo 22:48, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable. Gwk 23:24, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete, neologism. Dcarrano 01:08, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Fringe "science". Only very well known quackery is encylopedic, IMO. Friday 14:03, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.