This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaneytalk 15:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
Neologism/original research/spam. - choster 16:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete as per nominator Lullabye Muse 16:28, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete, looks like a neologism to me. --IByte 16:45, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete per submitter. --GraemeL(talk) 16:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Comment isn't it a copyvio from here? I'm not hot on copyvios, so don't know. Alf 19:51, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I reckon so. Googling that definition at the bottom of the webpage produces only a single hit which is that page. I will tag it and bag it. -Splash 22:45, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.