Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioErotica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 04:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BioErotica

Protologism, only 12 unique google hits on bioerotica, all coming from wikipedia or from the one article at globalsecurityreport.com, which has an alexa ranking of about 6 million. Doesn't meet WP:V. Note that the BBC news link in this article is not on this topic Xyzzyplugh 12:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also, zero nexis hits. Uucp 14:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Tiberius McMahon 09:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: User's first contribution except for own userpage. Punkmorten 09:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the phrase does not appear to be in use at all, aside from wiki and its mirrors and the aforementioned globalsecurityreport.com. Fails WP:V, and appears to to be a madeup word that nobody uses. -- Whpq 20:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Zaxem 05:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.