Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bingo.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bingo.com

Straight advertising/spam. Original author removed prod. My vote would be Delete Dipics 15:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• I have added Bingoadvantage to this AfD, same editor. Delete both per nom. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Note: The author also removed a speedy deletion notice on Bingoadvantage Lurker 14:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Why cant one author write 2 articles? Bingo.com is probably noteable enough to list. And there are not even any links in it. Keep —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.92.169.157 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 July 2006

• Delete per nominator. Wikipedia is not an appropriate medium in which to advertise, and right now, that is precisely what the article reads like. --64.132.163.178 15:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Bingo! er....Delete Article reads like advertising. Wildthing61476 15:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• delete reads like ad. -Sanbeg 16:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Voice of Treason 16:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per above. NawlinWiki 18:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per NawlinWiki. 1ne 20:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as WP:SPAM. WP:WEB would work too, since the Alexa rank for bingo.com is 58,564 (which is close but still a "meh", IMHO), and bingoadvantage.com's is 175,889 (which is a definite "adios!"). --Kinu ^t/_c 23:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• N-48. Er. Delete both.: Both articles do make excellent advertisements. --awh (Talk) 02:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Two fat ladies say "delete this article" It's spam. Plain and simple Lurker 14:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete --Yunipo 09:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.