Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binary alphabet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep the version done by Quarl. howcheng {chat} 07:18, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Binary alphabet

See talk:ASCII, the current article there (which has no incoming links) is basically a poor article on ascii. However since the term is not normally used to reffer to ascii and apparently is used to reffer to something else so it should not be simply redirected to ascii. Therefore the article needs to either be replaced with one covering the term in set theory or deleted. Since i am incapable of the former i am submitting for deletion. Plugwash 22:43, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep the new disambig page. I've boldly replaced the "poor ASCII" content with a disambig to ASCII and "members of a binary set". I think it is not uncommon or surprising for imprecise language to refer to ASCII as "binary alphabet" so we need this for those looking for ASCII and to prevent them from writing another "poor ASCII". (I couldn't find any wikipedia article on set theory using the term "alphabet".) --Quarl 03:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.